↓ Skip to main content

Study of the f2(1270) , f2′(1525) , K¯2*(1430) , f0(13…

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Study of the f2(1270) , f2′(1525) , K¯2*(1430) , f0(1370) and f0(1710) production from ψ(nS) and ϒ(nS) decays
Published in
Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology, May 2015
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.91.094013
Authors

Lian-Rong Dai, Ju-Jun Xie, Eulogio Oset

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2015.
All research outputs
#9,812,231
of 12,803,979 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#6,132
of 13,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,703
of 216,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review D: Particles Fields Gravitation and Cosmology
#400
of 752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,803,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,422 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.