↓ Skip to main content

Reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain in human chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
32 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain in human chronic low back pain
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helene M Langevin, James R Fox, Cathryn Koptiuch, Gary J Badger, Ann C Greenan- Naumann, Nicole A Bouffard, Elisa E Konofagou, Wei-Ning Lee, John J Triano, Sharon M Henry

Abstract

The role played by the thoracolumbar fascia in chronic low back pain (LBP) is poorly understood. The thoracolumbar fascia is composed of dense connective tissue layers separated by layers of loose connective tissue that normally allow the dense layers to glide past one another during trunk motion. The goal of this study was to quantify shear plane motion within the thoracolumbar fascia using ultrasound elasticity imaging in human subjects with and without chronic low back pain (LBP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 441 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 14%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 9%
Student > Postgraduate 33 7%
Other 28 6%
Other 113 25%
Unknown 113 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 15%
Sports and Recreations 60 13%
Engineering 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 131 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#741,002
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#96
of 4,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,815
of 134,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.