↓ Skip to main content

Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002229.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry MP Boardman, Louise Hartley, Anne Eisinga, Caroline Main, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Rafael Gabriel Sanchez, Beatrice Knight

Abstract

Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 292 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 20%
Unspecified 43 14%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Other 83 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 45%
Unspecified 64 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 47 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#69,782
of 13,500,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 10,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,523
of 215,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,500,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.