You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two hyaluronic acid formulations for safety and efficacy (CHASE) study in knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 26-week non-inferiority trial comparing Durolane to Artz
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13075-015-0557-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heng Zhang, Ke Zhang, Xianlong Zhang, Zhenan Zhu, Shigui Yan, Tiansheng Sun, Ai Guo, John Jones, R Grant Steen, Bin Shan, Jenny Zhang, Jianhao Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 61 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,363
of 3,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,316
of 278,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#42
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.