↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular and inflammatory effects of simvastatin therapy in patients with COPD: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular and inflammatory effects of simvastatin therapy in patients with COPD: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/copd.s76061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle E John, John R Cockcroft, Tricia M McKeever, William R Coward, Dennis J Shale, Simon R Johnson, Jim G Thornton, Timothy W Harrison, Alan J Knox, Charlotte E Bolton

Abstract

There is excess cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aortic stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk, and systemic and airway inflammation are increased in patients with the disease. Statins modulate aortic stiffness and have anti-inflammatory properties. A proof-of-principle, double-blind, randomized trial determined if 6 weeks of simvastatin 20 mg once daily reduced aortic stiffness and systemic and airway inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,485
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,122
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.