↓ Skip to main content

FractionOptimizer: a method for optimal peptide fractionation in bottom-up proteomics

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FractionOptimizer: a method for optimal peptide fractionation in bottom-up proteomics
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-1054-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizaveta M. Solovyeva, Anna A. Lobas, Arthur T. Kopylov, Irina Y. Ilina, Lev I. Levitsky, Sergei A. Moshkovskii, Mikhail V. Gorshkov

Abstract

Recent advances in mass spectrometry and separation technologies created the opportunities for deep proteome characterization using shotgun proteomics approaches. The "real world" sample complexity and high concentration range limit the sensitivity of this characterization. The common strategy for increasing the sensitivity is sample fractionation prior to analysis either at the protein or the peptide level. Typically, fractionation at the peptide level is performed using linear gradient high-performance liquid chromatography followed by uniform fraction collection. However, this way of peptide fractionation results in significantly suboptimal operation of the mass spectrometer due to the non-uniform distribution of peptides between the fractions. In this work, we propose an approach based on peptide retention time prediction allowing optimization of chromatographic conditions and fraction collection procedures. An open-source software implementing the approach called FractionOptimizer was developed and is available at http://hg.theorchromo.ru/FractionOptimizer . The performance of the developed tool was demonstrated for human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cell line lysate. In these experiments, we improved the uniformity of the peptides distribution between fractions. Moreover, in addition to 13,492 peptides, we found 6787 new peptides not identified in the experiments without fractionation and up to 800 new proteins (or 25%). Graphical abstract The analysis workflow employing FractionOptimizer software.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Chemistry 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,609,074
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#198
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,145
of 340,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.