↓ Skip to main content

The effects of maintenance schedules following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of maintenance schedules following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMJ Open, March 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew M Wilson, Paula Browne, Sandra Olive, Allan Clark, Penny Galey, Emma Dix, Helene Woodhouse, Sue Robinson, Edward C F Wilson, Lindi Staunton, Wilson AM, Browne P, Olive S, Clark A, Galey P, Dix E, Woodhouse H, Robinson S, Wilson EC, Staunton L, A. M. Wilson, P. Browne, S. Olive, A. Clark, P. Galey, E. Dix, H. Woodhouse, S. Robinson, E. C. F. Wilson, L. Staunton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Unspecified 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Unspecified 28 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 24 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#404,092
of 11,162,533 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#861
of 8,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,396
of 209,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#28
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,162,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.