You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic Risk Profiling of Ischemic Stroke: Results of an International Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James F. Meschia, Andrew Singleton, Michael A. Nalls, Stephen S. Rich, Pankaj Sharma, Luigi Ferrucci, Mar Matarin, Dena G. Hernandez, Kerra Pearce, Thomas G. Brott, Robert D. Brown, John Hardy, Bradford B. Worrall |
| Abstract |
Familial aggregation of ischemic stroke derives from shared genetic and environmental factors. We present a meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans (GWAS) from 3 cohorts to identify the contribution of common variants to ischemic stroke risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2011.
All research outputs
#13,353,865
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#106,229
of 193,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,876
of 130,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,366
of 2,541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.