You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Prospective Study of Diet Quality and Mental Health in Adolescents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024805 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felice N. Jacka, Peter J. Kremer, Michael Berk, Andrea M. de Silva-Sanigorski, Marjorie Moodie, Eva R. Leslie, Julie A. Pasco, Boyd A. Swinburn |
| Abstract |
A number of cross-sectional and prospective studies have now been published demonstrating inverse relationships between diet quality and the common mental disorders in adults. However, there are no existing prospective studies of this association in adolescents, the onset period of most disorders, limiting inferences regarding possible causal relationships. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 23% |
| Australia | 6 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 617 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 602 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 127 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 10% |
| Researcher | 53 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 99 | 16% |
| Unknown | 143 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 16% |
| Psychology | 92 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 16% |
| Unknown | 168 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#113,657
of 24,178,331 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,759
of 207,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362
of 133,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#16
of 2,558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,178,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.