↓ Skip to main content

Autistic children at risk of being underestimated: school-based pilot study of a strength-informed assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Autism, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 719)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
521 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
106 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autistic children at risk of being underestimated: school-based pilot study of a strength-informed assessment
Published in
Molecular Autism, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13229-015-0006-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valérie Courchesne, Andrée-Anne S Meilleur, Marie-Pier Poulin-Lord, Michelle Dawson, Isabelle Soulières

Abstract

An important minority of school-aged autistic children, often characterized as 'nonverbal' or 'minimally verbal,' displays little or no spoken language. These children are at risk of being judged 'low-functioning' or 'untestable' via conventional cognitive testing practices. One neglected avenue for assessing autistic children so situated is to engage current knowledge of autistic cognitive strengths. Our aim was thus to pilot a strength-informed assessment of autistic children whose poor performance on conventional instruments suggests their cognitive potential is very limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 521 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 35%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#65,421
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Autism
#5
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#622
of 274,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Autism
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.