↓ Skip to main content

Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Joachim Kugler, Jane Burridge, Simone Mückel, Bernhard Elsner

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) acquired or generalised weakness due to critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP) are major causes of chronically impaired motor function that can affect activities of daily living and quality of life. Physical rehabilitation of those affected might help to improve activities of daily living.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 1%
Russia 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 189 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 21%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Other 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 66 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 27%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 38 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,281,432
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,644
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,658
of 223,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.