↓ Skip to main content

Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Joachim Kugler, Jane Burridge, Simone Mückel, Bernhard Elsner

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) acquired or generalised weakness due to critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP) are major causes of chronically impaired motor function that can affect activities of daily living and quality of life. Physical rehabilitation of those affected might help to improve activities of daily living.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 273 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Other 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 74 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 24%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 91 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,929,388
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,051
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,554
of 272,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.