↓ Skip to main content

Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000024.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter AG Sandercock, Carl Counsell, Edward J Kane

Abstract

Most ischaemic strokes are caused by a blood clot blocking an artery in the brain. Clot prevention with anticoagulants might improve outcomes if bleeding risks are low. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1995, with recent updates in 2004 and 2008.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Master 34 16%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,959,709
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,078
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,212
of 274,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.