↓ Skip to main content

Telephone, print, and Web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Telephone, print, and Web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11764-015-0442-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana D. Goode, Sheleigh P. Lawler, Charlotte L. Brakenridge, Marina M. Reeves, Elizabeth G. Eakin, Goode AD, Lawler SP, Brakenridge CL, Reeves MM, Eakin EG

Abstract

Broad-reach (non-face-to-face) modalities offer an accessible and cost-effective means to provide behavior change programs in diverse and growing cancer survivor populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of physical activity, dietary, and/or weight control interventions for cancer survivors in which telephone, short-message service, print, and/or Web is the primary method of delivery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Unspecified 10 9%
Other 30 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Psychology 18 15%
Unspecified 14 12%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Other 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,069,767
of 11,345,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#76
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,924
of 210,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,345,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.