↓ Skip to main content

Size and Usage Patterns of Private TB Drug Markets in the High Burden Countries

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Size and Usage Patterns of Private TB Drug Markets in the High Burden Countries
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018964
Pubmed ID
Authors

William A. Wells, Colin Fan Ge, Nitin Patel, Teresa Oh, Elizabeth Gardiner, Michael E. Kimerling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 190 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 23%
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 38%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,040,543
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,773
of 202,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,013
of 112,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#228
of 1,583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.