You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What to give the patient who has everything? A qualitative study of prescribing for multimorbidity in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp15x684001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Sinnott, Sheena Mc Hugh, Maria B Boyce, Colin P Bradley |
| Abstract |
Using clinical guidelines in the management of patients with multimorbidity can lead to the prescription of multiple and sometimes conflicting medications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,063,400
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,636
of 4,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,483
of 263,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.