↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative-Proteomic Comparison of Alpha and Beta Cells to Uncover Novel Targets for Lineage Reprogramming

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative-Proteomic Comparison of Alpha and Beta Cells to Uncover Novel Targets for Lineage Reprogramming
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0095194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Choudhary, Kaihui Hu He, Philipp Mertins, Namrata D. Udeshi, Vlado Dančík, Dina Fomina-Yadlin, Stefan Kubicek, Paul A. Clemons, Stuart L. Schreiber, Steven A. Carr, Bridget K. Wagner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
India 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,901,416
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#50,560
of 225,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,337
of 244,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,068
of 4,974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.