↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life‐limiting conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
94 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life‐limiting conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010750.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Beecham, Bridget Candy, Richard Howard, Renée McCulloch, Jo Laddie, Henrietta Rees, Victoria Vickerstaff, Myra Bluebond‐Langner, Louise Jones

Abstract

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) which include a wide range of diagnoses including cancer. The current literature indicates that pain is not well managed, however the evidence base to guide clinicians is limited. There is a clear need for evidence from a systematic review to inform prescribing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 495 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 16%
Researcher 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 113 23%
Unknown 148 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 12%
Psychology 26 5%
Unspecified 21 4%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 172 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#602,659
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,089
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,332
of 276,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.