↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life‐limiting conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
93 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for pain in children and adolescents with life‐limiting conditions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010750.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Beecham, Bridget Candy, Richard Howard, Renée McCulloch, Jo Laddie, Henrietta Rees, Victoria Vickerstaff, Myra Bluebond‐Langner, Louise Jones

Abstract

Pain is one of the most common symptoms in children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) which include a wide range of diagnoses including cancer. The current literature indicates that pain is not well managed, however the evidence base to guide clinicians is limited. There is a clear need for evidence from a systematic review to inform prescribing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 509 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 16%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 114 22%
Unknown 152 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 11%
Psychology 29 6%
Unspecified 23 4%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 177 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#625,841
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,075
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,443
of 277,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.