↓ Skip to main content

Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
274 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
721 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012948
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler

Abstract

Current methods for the detection of contagious outbreaks give contemporaneous information about the course of an epidemic at best. It is known that individuals near the center of a social network are likely to be infected sooner during the course of an outbreak, on average, than those at the periphery. Unfortunately, mapping a whole network to identify central individuals who might be monitored for infection is typically very difficult. We propose an alternative strategy that does not require ascertainment of global network structure, namely, simply monitoring the friends of randomly selected individuals. Such individuals are known to be more central. To evaluate whether such a friend group could indeed provide early detection, we studied a flu outbreak at Harvard College in late 2009. We followed 744 students who were either members of a group of randomly chosen individuals or a group of their friends. Based on clinical diagnoses, the progression of the epidemic in the friend group occurred 13.9 days (95% C.I. 9.9-16.6) in advance of the randomly chosen group (i.e., the population as a whole). The friend group also showed a significant lead time (p<0.05) on day 16 of the epidemic, a full 46 days before the peak in daily incidence in the population as a whole. This sensor method could provide significant additional time to react to epidemics in small or large populations under surveillance. The amount of lead time will depend on features of the outbreak and the network at hand. The method could in principle be generalized to other biological, psychological, informational, or behavioral contagions that spread in networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 721 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 38 5%
United Kingdom 9 1%
Italy 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
India 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 23 3%
Unknown 619 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 178 25%
Researcher 130 18%
Student > Master 89 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 47 7%
Other 152 21%
Unknown 69 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 143 20%
Social Sciences 101 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 8%
Psychology 52 7%
Other 187 26%
Unknown 97 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 556. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#44,495
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#750
of 225,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 107,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 939 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 939 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.