↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Variants of TSLP and Asthma in an Admixed Urban Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Variants of TSLP and Asthma in an Admixed Urban Population
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengling Liu, Linda Rogers, Qinyi Cheng, Yongzhao Shao, Maria Elena Fernandez-Beros, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Helen N. Lyon, Zofia K. Z. Gajdos, Sailaja Vedantam, Peter Gregersen, Michael F. Seldin, Bertram Bleck, Adaikalavan Ramasamy, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Mikko Kuokkanen, Tarja Laitinen, Johan Eriksson, Terho Lehtimäki, Olli T. Raitakari, Joan Reibman

Abstract

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an IL7-like cytokine produced by bronchial epithelial cells is upregulated in asthma and induces dendritic cell maturation supporting a Th2 response. Environmental pollutants, including tobacco smoke and diesel exhaust particles upregulate TSLP suggesting that TSLP may be an interface between environmental pollution and immune responses in asthma. Since asthma is prevalent in urban communities, variants in the TSLP gene may be important in asthma susceptibility in these populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Other 3 7%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,403,499
of 25,109,453 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,653
of 217,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,184
of 135,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,061
of 2,554 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,554 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.