↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004749.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Fiander, Jessie McGowan, Roland Grad, Pierre Pluye, Karin Hannes, Michel Labrecque, Nia W Roberts, Douglas M Salzwedel, Vivian Welch, Peter Tugwell

Abstract

There is a large volume of health information available, and, if applied in clinical practice, may contribute to effective patient care. Despite an abundance of information, sub-optimal care is common. Many factors influence practitioners' use of health information, and format (electronic or other) may be one such factor.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Unspecified 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 69 32%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 16%
Unspecified 29 13%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Psychology 15 7%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#430,372
of 12,813,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,397
of 10,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,459
of 216,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,813,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.