You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Efficacy of Lamivudine and Emtricitabine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0079981 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nathan Ford, Zara Shubber, Andrew Hill, Marco Vitoria, Meg Doherty, Edward J. Mills, Andy Gray |
Abstract |
Lamivudine and emtricitabine are considered equivalent by several guidelines, but evidence of comparable efficacy is conflicting. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Libya | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Researcher | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,731,465
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,513
of 194,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,891
of 213,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,807
of 5,145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.