↓ Skip to main content

Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
438 tweeters
weibo
8 weibo users
facebook
178 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
181 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
682 Mendeley
Title
Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects
Published in
Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa2397
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Tumbleston, David Shirvanyants, Nikita Ermoshkin, Rima Janusziewicz, Ashley R. Johnson, David Kelly, Kai Chen, Robert Pinschmidt, Jason P. Rolland, Alexander Ermoshkin, Edward T. Samulski, Joseph M. DeSimone

Abstract

Additive manufacturing processes such as 3D printing use time-consuming, stepwise layer-by-layer approaches to object fabrication. We demonstrate the continuous generation of monolithic polymeric parts up to tens of centimeters in size with feature resolution below 100 micrometers. Continuous liquid interface production is achieved with an oxygen-permeable window below the ultraviolet image projection plane, which creates a "dead zone" (persistent liquid interface) where photopolymerization is inhibited between the window and the polymerizing part. We delineate critical control parameters and show that complex solid parts can be drawn out of the resin at rates of hundreds of millimeters per hour. These print speeds allow parts to be produced in minutes instead of hours.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 438 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 682 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
Germany 11 2%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Japan 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Other 17 2%
Unknown 613 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 253 37%
Researcher 110 16%
Student > Master 107 16%
Student > Bachelor 63 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 116 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 248 36%
Materials Science 107 16%
Chemistry 102 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 8%
Physics and Astronomy 43 6%
Other 129 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,451
of 8,665,693 outputs
Outputs from Science
#86
of 42,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57
of 213,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#4
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,665,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.