You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for reducing medication errors in children in hospital
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006208.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jolanda M Maaskant, Hester Vermeulen, Bugewa Apampa, Bernard Fernando, Maisoon A Ghaleb, Antje Neubert, Sudhin Thayyil, Aung Soe |
Abstract |
Many hospitalised patients are affected by medication errors (MEs) that may cause discomfort, harm and even death. Children are at especially high risk of harm as the result of MEs because such errors are potentially more hazardous to them than to adults. Until now, interventions to reduce MEs have led to only limited improvements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 20% |
Spain | 8 | 18% |
Argentina | 2 | 4% |
El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 427 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 70 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 51 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 10% |
Researcher | 42 | 10% |
Other | 20 | 5% |
Other | 62 | 14% |
Unknown | 144 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 6% |
Psychology | 23 | 5% |
Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
Other | 47 | 11% |
Unknown | 160 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,240,528
of 24,753,534 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,706
of 12,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,674
of 264,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,753,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.