↓ Skip to main content

A Review of the Antioxidant Mechanisms of Polyphenol Compounds Related to Iron Binding

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,026)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
959 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Review of the Antioxidant Mechanisms of Polyphenol Compounds Related to Iron Binding
Published in
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12013-009-9043-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan R. Perron, Julia L. Brumaghim

Abstract

In this review, primary attention is given to the antioxidant (and prooxidant) activity of polyphenols arising from their interactions with iron both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, an overview of oxidative stress and the Fenton reaction is provided, as well as a discussion of the chemistry of iron binding by catecholate, gallate, and semiquinone ligands along with their stability constants, UV-vis spectra, stoichiometries in solution as a function of pH, rates of iron oxidation by O(2) upon polyphenol binding, and the published crystal structures for iron-polyphenol complexes. Radical scavenging mechanisms of polyphenols unrelated to iron binding, their interactions with copper, and the prooxidant activity of iron-polyphenol complexes are briefly discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 959 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 936 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 166 17%
Student > Master 140 15%
Researcher 110 11%
Student > Bachelor 80 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 74 8%
Other 148 15%
Unknown 241 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 220 23%
Chemistry 175 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 3%
Other 139 14%
Unknown 284 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,635,788
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#13
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,040
of 188,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them