You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0103-64402005000300008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivaughn Marchan, Larry Coldero, Robert Whiting, Salvacion Barclay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 41% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#197
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,865
of 172,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.