↓ Skip to main content

A review of the global relationship among freshwater fish, autotrophic activity, and regional climate

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the global relationship among freshwater fish, autotrophic activity, and regional climate
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11160-015-9384-z
Authors

Andrew M. Deines, David B. Bunnell, Mark W. Rogers, T. Douglas Beard, William W. Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 31%
Environmental Science 14 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,396,557
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#225
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,983
of 279,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them