↓ Skip to main content

An in vitro study of anti-inflammatory activity of standardised Andrographis paniculata extracts and pure andrographolide

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An in vitro study of anti-inflammatory activity of standardised Andrographis paniculata extracts and pure andrographolide
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0525-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell Low, Cheang S Khoo, Gerald Münch, Suresh Govindaraghavan, Nikolaus J Sucher

Abstract

The anti-inflammatory activity of Andrographis paniculata (Acanthaceae), a traditional medicine widely used in Asia, is commonly attributed to andrographolide, its main secondary metabolite. Commercial A. paniculata extracts are standardised to andrographolide content. We undertook the present study to investigate 1) how selective enrichment of andrographolide in commercial A. paniculata extracts affects the variability of non-standardised phytochemical components and 2) if variability in the non-standardised components of the extract affects the pharmacological activity of andrographolide itself.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 9 6%
Lecturer 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 56 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 60 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,621,397
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#466
of 3,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,520
of 352,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.