↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, May 2014
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian N Bruce, Aidan G O'Keeffe, Vern Farewell, John G Hanly, Susan Manzi, Li Su, Dafna D Gladman, Sang-Cheol Bae, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Daniel J Wallace, Ann E Clarke, Sasha Bernatsky, Ellen M Ginzler, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Joan T Merrill, Graciela S Alarcón, Barri J Fessler, Paul R Fortin, Michelle Petri, Kristjan Steinsson, Mary Anne Dooley, Munther A Khamashta, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Asad A Zoma, Gunnar K Sturfelt, Ola Nived, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Kenneth C Kalunian, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Sam Lim, Diane L Kamen, Christine A Peschken, Murat Inanc, Murray B Urowitz

Abstract

We studied damage accrual and factors determining development and progression of damage in an international cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Unspecified 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 48 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 56%
Unspecified 32 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 15 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,774,218
of 12,361,872 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1,046
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,162
of 221,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#42
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,361,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.