↓ Skip to main content

Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polychaeta, Annelida, and Articulata are not monophyletic: articulating the Metameria (Metazoa, Coelomata)
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, March 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0101-81752003000100006
Authors

Waltécio de Oliveira Almeida, Martin Lindsey Christoffersen, Dalton de Souza Amorim, André Rinaldo Senna Garraffoni, Gustavo Sene Silva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 4%
Germany 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 121 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 24%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Professor 10 7%
Other 36 26%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 71%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 18 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,046,166
of 12,826,501 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
#94
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,193
of 269,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,826,501 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them