↓ Skip to main content

Movement control exercise versus general exercise to reduce disability in patients with low back pain and movement control impairment. A randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Movement control exercise versus general exercise to reduce disability in patients with low back pain and movement control impairment. A randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeannette Saner, Jan Kool, Rob A de Bie, Judith M Sieben, Hannu Luomajoki

Abstract

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) in subacute and chronic stages can be treated effectively with exercise therapy. Research guidelines recommend evaluating different treatments in defined subgroups of patients with NSLBP. A subgroup of patients with movement control impairment (MCI) improved significantly on patient specific function and disability in a previous case series after movement control exercises.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 262 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 25%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 70 26%
Unknown 25 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Sports and Recreations 28 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 39 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,707,422
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,130
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,894
of 95,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.