You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Espiritualidade nos cuidados paliativos: experiência vivida de uma equipe interdisciplinar*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017007403312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel Cristina de Oliveira Arrieira, Maira Buss Thofehrn, Adrize Rutz Porto, Pedro Márlon Martter Moura, Caroline Lemos Martins, Michelle Barboza Jacondino |
| Abstract |
Objective To understand the experience of spirituality in the daily routine of a palliative care interdisciplinary team. Method A qualitative study was conducted with an oncological palliative care team in southern Brazil. The data was collected through phenomenological interviews in 2014, and interpreted using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Results Six professionals participated in the study. Spiritually-related activities, such as prayer and providing comprehensive care, were useful therapeutic resources for offering comfort, survival with dignity and humanization of death, in addition to helping the team and patients understand the end-of-life process and search for meaning in the suffering caused by illness. Conclusion Spirituality on the part of professionals with patients imparted meaning to their palliative care work and facilitated the formation of bonds between teams, patients, and family members. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 21% |
| Psychology | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#157
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,247
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.