↓ Skip to main content

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010217.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Kang, Julia Han, Molly M Neuberger, M. Louis Moy, Sheila A Wallace, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Philipp Dahm

Abstract

Transurethral radiofrequency collagen denaturation is a relatively novel, minimally invasive device-based intervention used to treat individuals with urinary incontinence (UI). No systematic review of the evidence supporting its use has been published to date.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Unspecified 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 38%
Unspecified 20 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,509,624
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,077
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,659
of 221,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#185
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.