You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.3190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takeshi Maruyama, Stephanie K Dougan, Matthias C Truttmann, Angelina M Bilate, Jessica R Ingram, Hidde L Ploegh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 23% |
| Japan | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 66% |
| Scientists | 19 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,959 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1900 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 444 | 23% |
| Researcher | 391 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 262 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 240 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 86 | 4% |
| Other | 233 | 12% |
| Unknown | 303 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 687 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 623 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 46 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 37 | 2% |
| Other | 133 | 7% |
| Unknown | 340 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#439,877
of 26,060,592 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#979
of 8,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,970
of 279,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#11
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,060,592 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.