You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Neanderthal in the karst: First dating, morphometric, and paleogenetic data on the fossil skeleton from Altamura (Italy)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Human Evolution, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.02.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Lari, Fabio Di Vincenzo, Andrea Borsato, Silvia Ghirotto, Mario Micheli, Carlotta Balsamo, Carmine Collina, Gianluca De Bellis, Silvia Frisia, Giacomo Giacobini, Elena Gigli, John C. Hellstrom, Antonella Lannino, Alessandra Modi, Alessandro Pietrelli, Elena Pilli, Antonio Profico, Oscar Ramirez, Ermanno Rizzi, Stefania Vai, Donata Venturo, Marcello Piperno, Carles Lalueza-Fox, Guido Barbujani, David Caramelli, Giorgio Manzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 13% |
| United States | 13 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 6% |
| Mexico | 8 | 6% |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 87% |
| Scientists | 16 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 22 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#63,069
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#11
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#599
of 278,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.