↓ Skip to main content

Looking the Part: Social Status Cues Shape Race Perception

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
26 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Looking the Part: Social Status Cues Shape Race Perception
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan B. Freeman, Andrew M. Penner, Aliya Saperstein, Matthias Scheutz, Nalini Ambady

Abstract

It is commonly believed that race is perceived through another's facial features, such as skin color. In the present research, we demonstrate that cues to social status that often surround a face systematically change the perception of its race. Participants categorized the race of faces that varied along White-Black morph continua and that were presented with high-status or low-status attire. Low-status attire increased the likelihood of categorization as Black, whereas high-status attire increased the likelihood of categorization as White; and this influence grew stronger as race became more ambiguous (Experiment 1). When faces with high-status attire were categorized as Black or faces with low-status attire were categorized as White, participants' hand movements nevertheless revealed a simultaneous attraction to select the other race-category response (stereotypically tied to the status cue) before arriving at a final categorization. Further, this attraction effect grew as race became more ambiguous (Experiment 2). Computational simulations then demonstrated that these effects may be accounted for by a neurally plausible person categorization system, in which contextual cues come to trigger stereotypes that in turn influence race perception. Together, the findings show how stereotypes interact with physical cues to shape person categorization, and suggest that social and contextual factors guide the perception of race.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 6%
Italy 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 222 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 33%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Master 23 9%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 111 45%
Social Sciences 43 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#234,747
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,415
of 223,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#815
of 143,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#31
of 2,573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.