↓ Skip to main content

Splinkerette PCR for Mapping Transposable Elements in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Splinkerette PCR for Mapping Transposable Elements in Drosophila
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J. Potter, Liqun Luo

Abstract

Transposable elements (such as the P-element and piggyBac) have been used to introduce thousands of transgenic constructs into the Drosophila genome. These transgenic constructs serve many roles, from assaying gene/cell function, to controlling chromosome arm rearrangement. Knowing the precise genomic insertion site for the transposable element is often desired. This enables identification of genomic enhancer regions trapped by an enhancer trap, identification of the gene mutated by a transposon insertion, or simplifying recombination experiments. The most commonly used transgene mapping method is inverse PCR (iPCR). Although usually effective, limitations with iPCR hinder its ability to isolate flanking genomic DNA in complex genomic loci, such as those that contain natural transposons. Here we report the adaptation of the splinkerette PCR (spPCR) method for the isolation of flanking genomic DNA of any P-element or piggyBac. We report a simple and detailed protocol for spPCR. We use spPCR to 1) map a GAL4 enhancer trap located inside a natural transposon, pinpointing a master regulatory region for olfactory neuron expression in the brain; and 2) map all commonly used centromeric FRT insertion sites. The ease, efficiency, and efficacy of spPCR could make it a favored choice for the mapping of transposable element in Drosophila.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 368 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 23%
Student > Master 36 9%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 5%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 54 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 21%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Chemistry 4 1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 56 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,826,341
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,421
of 225,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,405
of 104,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#145
of 739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.