You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Which Patients Are Not Suitable for a Subcutaneous ICD: Incidence and Predictors of Failed QRS‐T‐Wave Morphology Screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jce.12343 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise R A Olde Nordkamp, Joppe L F Warnaars, Kirsten M Kooiman, Joris R de Groot, Boudewijn R A M Rosenmöller, Arthur A M Wilde, Reinoud E Knops |
| Abstract |
The subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) relies on a pre-implantation QRS-T morphology screening (TMS) of the ECG to assure that it reliably detects the QRS complexes and T waves. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of the patients who fail this TMS is unknown. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 51% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,658,763
of 24,508,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
#2,119
of 2,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,562
of 315,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,508,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.