↓ Skip to main content

Differences in planning performance, a neurocognitive endophenotype, are associated with a functional variant in PER3 gene

Overview of attention for article published in Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in planning performance, a neurocognitive endophenotype, are associated with a functional variant in PER3 gene
Published in
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, March 2015
DOI 10.3109/07420528.2015.1014096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeimy González-Giraldo, Rodrigo E. González-Reyes, Shane T. Mueller, Brian J. Piper, Ana Adan, Diego A. Forero

Abstract

Performance alterations in executive function have been studied as potential endophenotypes for several neuropsychiatric diseases. Planning is an important component of executive function and has been shown to be affected in diseases such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and Parkinson's disease. Several genes related to dopaminergic systems, such as COMT, have been explored as candidates for influencing planning performance. The circadian clock gene PERIOD3 (PER3) has been shown to be associated with several complex behaviors in humans and could be involved in different signaling mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated the possible association between a functional polymorphism in the PER3 gene (PER3-VNTR, rs57875989) and performance in a commonly used test of planning (Tower of London, TOL) in 229 healthy subjects from Bogotá, Colombia. PER3-VNTR genotyping was carried out with conventional PCR and all participants completed the TOL test using the computerized Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) battery. A linear regression model was used for the analysis of association with the SNPStats program. We found that 4/4 genotype carriers showed a better performance and made fewer moves, in comparison to 4/5 and 5/5 genotype carriers (p = 0.003). These results appear to be independent from effects of this polymorphism on self-reported average hours of sleep during work days in our sample. This is the first evidence of an association between PER3-VNTR and planning performance in a sample of healthy subjects and our results are consistent from previous findings for alterations in other cognitive domains. Future studies examining additional genes could lead to the identification of novel molecular underpinnings of planning in healthy subjects and in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 31 27%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Psychology 19 17%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,340,344
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#1,161
of 1,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,023
of 279,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.