↓ Skip to main content

Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina O Nastri, Sarah F Lensen, Ahmed Gibreel, Nick Raine-Fenning, Rui A Ferriani, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Wellington P Martins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Librarian 9 9%
Other 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Unspecified 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Other 18 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#480,223
of 12,493,082 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,405
of 8,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,398
of 221,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,493,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.