↓ Skip to main content

Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009517.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina O Nastri, Sarah F Lensen, Ahmed Gibreel, Nick Raine-Fenning, Rui A Ferriani, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Wellington P Martins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 173 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 14 8%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 35 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#741,192
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,904
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,542
of 230,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.