You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0236945100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Balmford, Kevin J. Gaston, Simon Blyth, Alex James, Val Kapos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 756 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 21 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 2% |
| United States | 9 | 1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 2% |
| Unknown | 673 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 175 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 151 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 5% |
| Other | 139 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 316 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 256 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 4% |
| Unknown | 98 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,694,445
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30,185
of 104,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,315
of 148,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#76
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.