You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Secondary Confessions, Expert Testimony, and Unreliable Testimony
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11896-012-9102-x |
| Authors |
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Miranda L. Wilkinson, Charles A. Goodsell, Stacy A. Wetmore, Deah S. Quinlivan, Nicholaos J. Jones |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 50% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,741,259
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#26
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,951
of 160,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them