↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of inhibitors and facilitators for adhering to hypertension treatment among insured patients in rural Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions of inhibitors and facilitators for adhering to hypertension treatment among insured patients in rural Nigeria: a qualitative study.
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0624-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Odusola AO, Hendriks M, Schultsz C, Bolarinwa OA, Akande T, Osibogun A, Agyemang C, Ogedegbe G, Agbede K, Adenusi P, Lange J, van Weert H, Stronks K, Haafkens JA

Abstract

BackgroundUniversal health care coverage has been identified as a promising strategy for improving hypertension treatment and control rates in sub Saharan Africa (SSA). Yet, even when quality care is accessible, poor adherence can compromise treatment outcomes. To provide information for adherence support interventions, this study explored what low income patients who received hypertension care in the context of a community based health insurance program in Nigeria perceive as inhibitors and facilitators for adhering to pharmacotherapy and healthy behaviors.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative interview study with 40 insured hypertensive patients who had received hypertension care for¿>¿1 year in a rural primary care hospital in Kwara state, Nigeria. Supported by MAXQDA software, interview transcripts were inductively coded. Codes were then grouped into concepts and thematic categories, leading to matrices for inhibitors and facilitators of treatment adherence.ResultsImportant patient-identified facilitators of medication adherence included: affordability of care (through health insurance); trust in orthodox ¿western¿ medicines; trust in Doctor; dreaded dangers of hypertension; and use of prayer to support efficacy of pills. Inhibitors of medication adherence included: inconvenient clinic operating hours; long waiting times; under-dispensing of prescriptions; side-effects of pills; faith motivated changes of medication regimen; herbal supplementation/substitution of pills; and ignorance that regular use is needed. Local practices and norms were identified as important inhibitors to the uptake of healthier behaviors (e.g. use of salt for food preservation; negative cultural images associated with decreased body size and physical activity) Important factors facilitating such behaviors were the awareness that salt substitutes and products for composing healthier meals were cheaply available at local markets and that exercise could be integrated in people¿s daily activities (e.g. farming, yam pounding, and household chores).ConclusionsWith a better understanding of patient perceived inhibitors and facilitators of adherence to hypertension treatment, this study provides information for patient education and health system level interventions that can be designed to improve compliance.Trial registration ISRCTN47894401.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 51%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Unspecified 11 10%
Psychology 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Other 13 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,038,007
of 4,823,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,025
of 2,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,630
of 143,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#81
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,823,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.