You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Drives the Occurrence of the Melioidosis Bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei in Domestic Gardens?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003635 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mirjam Kaestli, Glenda Harrington, Mark Mayo, Mark D. Chatfield, Ian Harrington, Audrey Hill, Niels Munksgaard, Karen Gibb, Bart J. Currie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Researcher | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#8,238
of 9,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,316
of 279,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#188
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.