↓ Skip to main content

Materials characterization and histological analysis of explanted polypropylene, PTFE, and PET hernia meshes from an individual patient

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Materials characterization and histological analysis of explanted polypropylene, PTFE, and PET hernia meshes from an individual patient
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10856-013-4872-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. J. Wood, M. J. Cozad, D. A. Grant, A. M. Ostdiek, S. L. Bachman, S. A. Grant

Abstract

During its tenure in vivo, synthetic mesh materials are exposed to foreign body responses, which can alter physicochemical properties of the material. Three different synthetic meshes comprised of polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) materials were explanted from a single patient providing an opportunity to compare physicochemical changes between three different mesh materials in the same host. Results from infrared spectroscopy demonstrated significant oxidation in polypropylene mesh while ePTFE and PET showed slight chemical changes that may be caused by adherent scar tissue. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed a significant decrease in the heat of enthalpy and melt temperature in the polypropylene mesh while the ePTFE and PET showed little change. The presence of giant cells and plasma cells surrounding the ePTFE and PET were indicative of an active foreign body response. Scanning electron micrographs and photo micrographs displayed tissue entrapment and distortion of all three mesh materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Engineering 12 21%
Chemistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Materials Science 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,261,711
of 25,367,237 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#308
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,860
of 290,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,367,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.