↓ Skip to main content

Pairing call-response surveys and distance sampling for a mammalian carnivore

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pairing call-response surveys and distance sampling for a mammalian carnivore
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2015
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.865
Authors

Sara J. K. Hansen, Jacqueline L. Frair, H. Brian Underwood, James P. Gibbs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Austria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 50%
Environmental Science 17 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,373,225
of 18,234,522 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#635
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,361
of 233,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,234,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.