↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary report on endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment in children: results of a multicentric series

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preliminary report on endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment in children: results of a multicentric series
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00383-018-4262-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessio Pini Prato, Cinzia Mazzola, Girolamo Mattioli, Maria Escolino, Ciro Esposito, Antonio D’Alessio, Laura Caterina Abati, Lorenzo Leonelli, Claudio Carlini, Franco Rotundi, Pier Carlo Meinero

Abstract

Pilonidal disease is a troublesome acquired condition for whom various surgical treatments have been proposed with relatively high recurrence and complication rates. Since EPSiT technique has been described in 2013, it became an alternative treatment in adult practice. Our study reports the results of a multicentre series of pediatric patients who underwent EPSiT procedure over a 21-month period. Between July 2015 and March 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing EPSiT in four different pediatric surgical units have been enrolled. Details regarding demographic data, detailed surgical procedure, outcome and complications have been recorded. A total of 43 patients underwent EPSiT procedure. Mean age was 15 years. There was a slight female preponderance. Mean weight and height at surgery were 67 kg and 168 cm, respectively. In 14% of cases a previous ineffective procedure was performed. Mean length of procedure was 34 min and median hospital stay was 24 h (12-72 h). Median length of follow-up was 4 months (range 3-18 months). Complications leading to reoperation were reported in 9% of cases with an overall resolution rate of 88%. EPSiT proved to be feasible and safe even in the pediatric population. The effectiveness and safety of the procedure suggest that this technique can represent a valid alternative for the treatment of pilonidal disease in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Unspecified 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,576,697
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#82
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,148
of 327,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.