↓ Skip to main content

Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: A Social Media Discussion About the Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: A Social Media Discussion About the Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Levels to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism Trial
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salim R. Rezaie, Anand Swaminathan, Teresa Chan, Sam Shaikh, Michelle Lin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Other 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 26 32%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Computer Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#588,132
of 26,793,597 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#269
of 6,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,527
of 280,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#9
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,793,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.