↓ Skip to main content

Risks for Acquisition of Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women Who Report Sex with Women: A Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks for Acquisition of Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women Who Report Sex with Women: A Cohort Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Katherine K. Thomas, Tina L. Fiedler, Kathleen Ringwood, David N. Fredricks

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is common in women who have sex with women. While cross-sectional data support a role for sexual transmission, risks for incident BV have not been prospectively studied in this group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,797,546
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,083
of 219,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,209
of 102,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#244
of 735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.