You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risks for Acquisition of Bacterial Vaginosis Among Women Who Report Sex with Women: A Cohort Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011139 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeanne M. Marrazzo, Katherine K. Thomas, Tina L. Fiedler, Kathleen Ringwood, David N. Fredricks |
Abstract |
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is common in women who have sex with women. While cross-sectional data support a role for sexual transmission, risks for incident BV have not been prospectively studied in this group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 22% |
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,797,546
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,083
of 219,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,209
of 102,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#244
of 735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.