↓ Skip to main content

The Flexible Nature of Unconscious Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Flexible Nature of Unconscious Cognition
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martijn E. Wokke, Simon van Gaal, H. Steven Scholte, K. Richard Ridderinkhof, Victor A. F. Lamme

Abstract

The cognitive signature of unconscious processes is hotly debated recently. Generally, consciousness is thought to mediate flexible, adaptive and goal-directed behavior, but in the last decade unconscious processing has rapidly gained ground on traditional conscious territory. In this study we demonstrate that the scope and impact of unconscious information on behavior and brain activity can be modulated dynamically on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants performed a Go/No-Go experiment in which an unconscious (masked) stimulus preceding a conscious target could be associated with either a Go or No-Go response. Importantly, the mapping of stimuli onto these actions varied on a trial-by-trial basis, preventing the formation of stable associations and hence the possibility that unconscious stimuli automatically activate these control actions. By eliminating stimulus-response associations established through practice we demonstrate that unconscious information can be processed in a flexible and adaptive manner. In this experiment we show that the same unconscious stimulus can have a substantially different effect on behavior and (prefrontal) brain activity depending on the rapidly changing task context in which it is presented. This work suggests that unconscious information processing shares many sophisticated characteristics (including flexibility and context-specificity) with its conscious counterpart.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
France 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 131 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 41%
Neuroscience 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Philosophy 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,435,130
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,907
of 218,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,800
of 136,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#310
of 2,578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.