↓ Skip to main content

Endotracheal intubation at birth for preventing morbidity and mortality in vigorous, meconium-stained infants born at term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endotracheal intubation at birth for preventing morbidity and mortality in vigorous, meconium-stained infants born at term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000500
Authors

Henry L Halliday, David G Sweet

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Researcher 12 14%
Other 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,083,037
of 13,465,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,689
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,904
of 222,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,465,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.